You are hereGot Food? How to Know if You Are Eating Enough
Got Food? How to Know if You Are Eating Enough
A few people who train at CFO, aka CFOers, are doing a Paleo Challenge until March 30th. For those of you new to the whole Paleo thing, for the next 33 days their diet will consist of unlimited amounts of meat, fish, eggs, nuts, seeds, coconut, veggies and some fruit (I like to frame it this way rather then focus on the foods that you can’t have). Although, I’m not officially participating in the challenge, I’ve joined their Google Group, where they stay in touch and get support from each other--which, by the way, is a brilliant idea!
Earlier this week there was in email from one of the participants, who shared that she’d been feeling chronically tired and hungry and was ready to call it quits. Fatigue, irritability and hunger are all common complaints I hear from folks switching from a high-sugar, high-grain diet (all grains/starch turn into sugar) to a lower-carbohydrate, higher-fat, higher-protein diet. This is often the result of two things: 1) the body goes through an initial adjustment period where it’s being deprived of sugar and now having to resort to burning fat for fuel and/or 2) the effects of withdrawal symptoms, particularly if you were eating a lot of dairy, gluten, or sugar.
That said, often when I hear this complaint, the first thing I do is look at what they’re eating. Always do the simplest thing first! Perhaps, those hunger pangs are simply your body’s way of saying, “feed me!”
So, just to be certain, I entered her breakfast, which consisted of 2 eggs, ⅓ can of coconut milk and berries, into a nutrition database and found that while it was a nice well-balanced meal, it only provided her with a mere 387 calories. So, how do you know if a 387-calorie meal is an adequate meal for you?
This is often where I see people make some of the biggest (and easiest to avoid) mistakes. When you’re figuring out how much to eat, how often to eat and how much of each macronutrient (protein, fat and carbohydrates) you should get, there are a number of factors that you will want to consider before putting that fork to your mouth. The #1 thing to remember is that we are each unique in our biological make-up and our tolerances or intolerances to certain foods. This is SO important! Just because someone who you train with is about the same size as you and benches the same as you, it does NOT therefore, mean you should both eat the same foods in the same quantities.
Here are some things to consider:
- What are YOUR goals? Do you want to lose weight, put on muscle, or maintain your weight? Knowing this will help guide you in choosing how much of each macronutrient you need at each meal. For example, those looking to lean out, may want to bias their meals towards more protein and less carbohydrate.
- How well do YOU tolerate cheese, milk and grains? How about sugar? How do you feel when you eat these foods? IF you get symptoms like, gas, bloating, belching, headaches, brain fog, fatigue, or congestion, your body is not handling these foods well and it’s best to avoid them.
- What’s your energy like after a meal? Do you crash after a meal? Food coma? Sure sign you had too many carbs/sugar or just ate too much.
- How active are YOU? If you sit for 8 hours a day, you probably don’t need to eat as much as someone who works on their feet all day. Even if you do CrossFit.
- How sore are you after workouts? Barring rare exceptions, if it takes you more than 3-5 days to recover from a workout, you probably need more protein.
- Are you hungry all the time? If you are hungry all the time, you are not getting enough food at your main meals. Your digestive system needs a break between meals and if you’re constantly feeding, you're putting a huge demand on your system. Also, if you're eating all the time, your body never gets to use its reserves (aka your body fat)! Most people can do just fine on 3 meals a day. Likewise, if you are not hungry, DON'T eat. Don't force food down your throat just because you think you should; your body will tell you when it needs to be re-fueled. I should also mention that often when someone has low-appetite (the one-meal-a-day person) it's usually a sign of a sluggish metabolism. Our metabolism will slow down to conserve energy if we restrict calories too much. Don't be a calorie counter. It takes the pleasure out of eating and will eventually cause your metabolism to come to a screeching halt.
The bottom line here is that each and every one of us is different in our dietary needs and this will most likely change at various stages through our life based on our training, health status, etc. Just remember to listen to your body. Don't ignore signals from your body. And don't get stuck in a rut with food; always re-evaluate the way you're eating and decide for yourself how well it is working for YOU.




Connie,
This is awesome, thank you for posting...Especially since I am the person you are talking about :) Even though I am a certified nutritional consultant and spend most of my time dealing with nutrition on many levels, when it comes to my own nutrition it is sometimes hard to see the obvious. The paleo challenge has been a great eye opener for me and revealed a few blindspots, like, even though I know that fat is good for you I had some old subconscious beliefs holding me back from really committing and tucking in (thank you 1980's low-fat dogma)...If you are going to cut carbohydrate you absolutely must increase your fat intake - this is where I was falling short and why I was so tired. After a few adjustments I am feeling much better.
I highly recommend anyone interested to give paleo a go and see if it feels right for them.
If anyone has questions I am more than happy to share my experience.
Peace out,
AKH
Mr. Mayor. Just click your heels three times. . .
great summary who ever wrote this.... now, i'll go chug some lemon flavored fish oil to get my day going. jade.
Can I join your google group? By coincidence I started eating strict p. again last week. I know I'll need some culinary inspiration soon.
Beth
beequade@gmail.com
I don't know why anyone who is following a CF-esque regiment would want to go low-carb. (Unless they were significantly overweight. And in that case, a decreased amount of "Metcon" would be called for?)
I think the revised, less carb-phobic Paleo dogma need to be better disseminated to the athletic-aspired masses.
I am not sure if you are asking a question or if you are making a statement...I could lecture you on the science behind how "lower-carb" is beneficial for athletic performance but I don't have time, and, if you really want to know you will do the research yourself.
P.S. a significantly overweight individual should be doing more metcon or metabolic work, not less.
AKH
I love love love today's photo! Who is this amazing athlete?
Mayor of Strength class, former mayor of Emeryville, caretaker of Manwell's weight belt and owner of the best pair of weightlifting shoes at CFO.
My hats off to Mr. Mayor. Nice lift, nice shoes! Amanda, when do you want your nuts, avocados and coconut products delivered?
That photo is pretty awesome. I especially like the pretty girls all lined up watching with awe.
Would someone mind posting the Google group for any folks who might want to join in on the on-going paleo support...?
Robyn, you mean it was the lift? I thought it was the leg I decided to show. Dang!
Zeke,
For some reason my lifts have improved since you stretched those shoes out.
wholehealthsource.blogspot.com/2011/08/carbohydrate-hypothesis-of-obesity.html
There are well-informed and cited stances that stand in opposition to the carb-is-the-ultimate-evil theory.
Ancestral AKA Paleo theory is not a cut and dry, one size fits all dogma. It's complex, evolving and dependent on a number of variables.
Just something to consider.
PS: No, I would not advocate heavy met con work for the severely or morbidly obese. I'd recommend dietary intervention (yes, probably lower carb as acknowledged in the article) with a focus on strength development and a lower impact approach to raising the metabolic rate. But we all know 80% of body comp is diet, not exercise. So yeah.. i'd argue for preserving what's left of their joint health while an effort is made to bring their weight down to a more workable level. And then throw them into chipper met cons all ya want.
There is a huge difference between "carb-is-the-ultimate-evil" type of eating plan a paleo. If paleo was "carbs are evil" you wouldn't get sweet potato, fruit, etc.
And just for the record, you can find well-informed and cited stances that stand in opposition to just about everything on the planet. Like some "well-informed" scientists actually say you don't really need to drink much water at all (a study out of Cal). So there's that.
You are correct, nothing is a one size fits all. I agree 100% which is why some humans absolutely thrive on a lower-carb style of eating and some do not. But just because some do not thrive does not negate the 1000's who do. So, dogma or no who the hell cares?
Since everything is relative a metcon (I prefer calling it metabolic work) for a morbidly obese person would be very different than for someone who was not morbidly obese, i'e. for a morbidly obese person standing from a seated position could be considered metabolic work. Metabolic work has its place no matter what your body type is - Just as does strength training. And yes there is a structured way to go about it - that's the fun part for the trainer/coach to figure out.
P.S why are you anonymous? how about you step out from behind your cloak and show yourself?
Crossfitters are not known for being level headed or unemotional about these subjects (as evidenced by your original response).
"I could lecture you on the science behind how "lower-carb" is beneficial for athletic performance but I don't have time, and, if you really want to know you will do the research yourself."
Anonymity allows me to poke holes in foolish theory and dogma while working out next to you.
So to confirm, the Paleo Challenge discussed here advocates a low(er)-carb approach, no?
"fatigue, irritability and hunger are all common complaints I hear from folks switching from a high-sugar, high-grain diet (all grains/starch turn into sugar) to a lower-carbohydrate, higher-fat, higher-protein diet."
And you assert that "lower carb" is beneficial for athletic performance but then claim that sweet potato and fruit (fructose vs sucrose is another fun debate to have) are acceptable?
My assertion is that this is not necessarily the best approach for people looking to achieve 'elite athletic performance" through a combination of strength training and met con. (weight loss? yes. Upping measured performance? I don't believe it's optimal but obviously possible. Improving health markers? Not necessarily.)
So returning to you original assertion that you could lecture me on the subject, would that be one of your quote banged "well informed" positions such as the water study out of cal or... something altogether different?
Anyway, i'm not trying to junk up this board with a tired debate being rehashed. Just throwing out an alternate POV that, ironically, is supported by many of the same minds that gave birth to the "Paleo" movement.
Have a good day.
Actually what you are trying to do is prove that you are right and everybody else is wrong but instead of having the balls to let everyone know who you are you keep it a secret while working out next to me which is just creepy. Grow a pair and maybe we could have a discussion in person, otherwise, peace out.
What's bothering you more. The anonymity or your inability to respond and defend your position in an intelligent manner?
Knowing my name changes none of my positions or yours.
See you next WOD.
Here's the thing. My position, as I've stated, is that nothing is going to work for everyone. Paleo works for many people. High-carb diets work for many people. Eating cake all day long may work for some people. Having human feces shoved down your throat by a dominatrix works for very few. With that said, I have nothing to defend because, unlike you, I am not taking an absolute stand. You are just as bad as the "paleo-is-the-answer-to-everything" folks by saying that paleo does not work for anyone, it's "dogma" blah, blah, blah.
And yes the anonymity thing bothers me immensely because I do not like cowards who are unwilling to stand up for what they believe in while showing their face. Plus the fact that you know who I am and I don't know who you are, like I said, is creepy. But it's cool, you do your thing. Maybe someday you will find the confidence to reveal yourself.