Meta-Analysis Finding: Processed Carbohydrates, not Fats, Pose Bigger Health Risk

Jun 19th, 2013

Category: Nutrition

Meta-Analysis Finding: Processed Carbohydrates, not Fats, Pose Bigger Health Risk

 Leka_Ellie.jpg

Leka and Ellie don’t look concerned about their saturated fat intake

A recent meta-analysis done by Ronald Krauss, director of atherosclerosis research at the Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute, and his team or researchers found that there was no association between saturated fat and heart disease risk.  For those of you who’ve read Good Calories, Bad Calories by Gary Taubes, the findings of this meta-analysis will have a familiar ring.  But the fact that this meta-analysis, and a significant one at that, comes from the scientific community, will hopefully bolster the message that Taubes has been trying to get across for the better part of the past decade.

The article’s final paragraph does a great job of summing up the findings of the research:

“If you reduce saturated fat and replace it with high glycemic-index carbohydrates, you may not only not get benefits—you might actually produce harm,” Ludwig argues. The next time you eat a piece of buttered toast, he says, consider that “butter is actually the more healthful component.”

Read the whole article here, which appeared in Scientific American:

Carbs against Cardio: More Evidence that Refined Carbohydrates, not Fats, Threaten the Heart